Yet despite these challenges, landscape architects are beginning to include BIM in their digital toolboxes. Regardless of the software being used, the up-front costs of adopting BIM, such as software and training expenses, can quickly eat up profits. Vectorworks, a more landscape-focused BIM software, does not exchange files directly with Revit, an obstacle that impedes digital collaboration with architects. The popular architecture-centric Autodesk Revit software lacks functional landscape modeling tools, though it has a library of building objects such as floors, windows, doors, and roofs. The advantages of BIM adoption are rarely as obvious as the drawbacks. It’s a familiar scene in landscape architecture offices of all sizes: Around a conference table, a debate arises about the benefits and drawbacks of adopting a Building Information Modeling (BIM) work flow. The power of BIM in coordinating design and construction information is most evident when developing multiple views and annotations from a single model. By Aidan Ackerman, ASLA 3-D view example. The collaborative power of information-driven modeling software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |